Physical review letters template ms word


















Use a single horizontal rule to separate the column headings from the entries in the table. Use horizontal space within the body of the table to separate broad groups of entries. Extra vertical space may be used between columns. Avoid vertical rules in tables. Use lower-case roman letters for footnotes placed at the bottom of a table. If space allows, long data tables can be included directly in the manuscript, rather than in the Supplemental Material. This decision is influenced by whether readers can accurately obtain the data from a figure and by how many readers are likely to use the numbers.

If experimental results are likely to be used as reference values by other authors, publication of the numbers is desirable. Extensive datasets may be deposited as Supplemental Material. If additional numerical data are available, include a statement regarding the availability of the data at the end of the manuscript, before the Acknowledgments.

The statement should cite a reference that provides the information needed to access the data e. See the Physical Review Style and Notation Guide for complete information regarding the proper form for data citations. Figures should have a width of a 8. Use a width of 1. Authors are required to submit all figures electronically for production. Preferred formats are. Number figures in the order in which they are referred to in the text.

Give each figure a caption that clearly summarizes the contents of the figure. Define figure symbols and curves either in a legend in the figure itself or in the caption. Label subfigures a , b , etc. If possible, submit figures with multiple panels as one file.

Format figures such that their content and details are readable when they are sized for the journal page. Make the height of the smallest capital letters and numerals at least 2 mm and make the diameter of each data point at least 1 mm. Avoid small open symbols, shading, and cross-hatching in figures.

Label figure axes with the quantities plotted and place units in parentheses after the quantity. Keep the style of figures and text consistent. Submit photographic images either grayscale or color as high-resolution. Avoid submitting prescreened scanned images of photographic material as they may not have sufficient resolution.

If scanned images have to be used, make scans with as high a resolution as possible preferably dpi or higher and then scale the figure to its final size. Figures should accurately present the scientific results. If adjustments to images, such as changing its brightness, are made, state the adjustment in the figure caption. For color-online-only figures, a. Ensure color online figures are intelligible in grey scale. To achieve this goal, use colors that have clearly distinguished grey-scale values.

To assist in differentiating colored curves, use different line styles dashed, solid, etc. If colored figures are desired in the print version of the journal, as in the online version, clearly indicate which figures are intended to be printed in color when the manuscript is submitted. Information about our pricing and payment policy for printed color figures is available via Color Figures in the Print Journal. In order to reproduce previously published figures, tables, etc.

Authors can demonstrate they have permission to reproduce the material by sending a written agreement from the publisher and author of the originally published work. If the original journal is published by APS, only a written agreement from the original author is required. The Physical Review Style and Notation Guide includes further details on formatting figures and tables. Submit manuscripts via our Submissions server. The Submissions server is designed to enable fast and easy uploading of the manuscript and to enable entering of information required for the peer-review process.

Receipt of a submission during business hours is acknowledged by email within one business day. Specify the author to whom correspondence should be addressed, and give all available contact information for this individual postal and email addresses, phone number. If an important subject of the manuscript is not classifiable by a PhySH concept, please give an appropriate keyword or phrase, and indicate approximately where in the scheme this topic would be best placed.

Feedback on the PhySH scheme is welcomed. Upload the main body of the manuscript including figures, tables, captions, etc. Also send a cover letter, auxiliary files and figures, and Supplemental Material via the Submissions server. Copies of the manuscript sent by regular mail are not processed.

While the agreement takes effect only when the manuscript is accepted for publication in a Physical Review journal, the prompt completion of this process prevents unnecessary processing delays. Accepted manuscripts are not forwarded to production until the journal is in receipt of the agreement. The Editorial Policies and Practices include further details on submission policies. When resubmitting a manuscript, please include a summary of changes made and a concise, point-by-point response to all recommendations and criticisms.

The modified manuscript and figures can be uploaded using the interactive resubmission forms available on our Submissions server. These forms should also be used when a manuscript previously submitted to one Physical Review journal is transferred to another.

Send the complete text file if there have been any changes. For any resubmission, please state whether or not the figures have been modified, and supply new electronic figures if there have been changes. It is only necessary to resend figure files when the previous versions are no longer valid. Please update any other information e. The Editorial Policies and Practices include further details on resubmission policies.

Information regarding the status of a manuscript under consideration by the Physical Review journals is available on the following webpage. If clarification is needed, send an email message to the journal with the following subject line: Status, Manuscript ID, Corresponding Author Name.

For accepted papers, information about the production status is available via a similar service maintained by the production vendor. A link to this service is provided on the manuscript status page. The following information provides details regarding the review process for manuscripts submitted to the Physical Review journals.

For more information on our standard peer-review practices, please consult the Editorial Policies and Practices. Peer Review : Peer review by independent, anonymous referees is one of the most important reasons for the existence of a scientific journal.

Journal readers benefit since at least one independent expert has judged that the manuscript is new and interesting, that it contributes to the advancement of the field, and that it is without apparent flaws. Of course, it is impossible for either the journal or the referees to guarantee the correctness or the originality of the research. Authors benefit from peer review via feedback on the research and the style of presentation. Note that the review policies and procedures vary by journal.

The time authors take to respond to referee comments and revise the manuscript also plays a role in the review timeline. Referee Selection : Editors choose one or more referees from a common database of thousands of potential referees. Suggesting Referees : Authors are encouraged to suggest the names of potential referees. Referee suggestions can be added during the manuscript submission process on the Editorial Info page.

The editors consider the suggestions, but the suggested referees are not necessarily chosen. Authors should avoid listing previous coauthors and collaborators. Excluding Referees : Authors can request that certain referees are not contacted. The names of these referees can be added during the manuscript submission process on the Editorial Info page. In the text box, provide the names of a few specific people not names of research groups, collaborations, or institutions and include a brief explanation of why you are making the request.

Although such requests are usually honored it is customary to give authors whose work is criticized in a manuscript an opportunity to respond to the criticism.

Number of Referees : The number of referees contacted to review a manuscript varies by journal. Typically, editors choose one or two referees to initially review a manuscript. In some cases, the editors may contact more than two referees, for example to gain input from referees with differing expertise or if there is uncertainty about the availability of a particular expert.

If a referee is tardy, the editors may contact an additional referee, and if the tardy referee then responds, we may receive more anonymous reports than usual. If an impasse is reached between the authors and referees, the editors may consult another referee in an effort to close the review process. And what letter template collection would be complete without a letter to Santa template? Your kids will love it. Use a Word letter template to get your words out and make a lasting impression.

Explore the collection now. Explore premium templates Bring your ideas to life with more customizable templates and new creative options when you subscribe to Microsoft Playful letterhead.

Eighties letterhead. Geometric letterhead. Explore premium templates. Benefits expiring letter healthcare. Letter to Santa. Business letterhead stationery Dots design. Letter of resignation due to merger. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of those factors the review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, Eigenfactor, etc. You must assess all the factors and then take the final call. We have extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help our researchers understand the access level of this journal.

The following table indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy. The 5 most common citation types in order of usage are:. Citation Style Type 1. Author Year 2. Numbered 3. Numbered Superscripted 4.

Author Year Cited Pages 5. Our journal submission experts are skilled in submitting papers to various international journals.

After uploading your paper on Typeset, you would see a button to request a journal submission service for Physical Review Letters. Typeset would allow download of your references in Physical Review Letters Endnote style, according to american-physical-society guidelines. Typset automatically formats your research paper to Physical Review Letters formatting guidelines and citation style.

One editor, K journal formats. With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there. I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With Typeset, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit.

In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting. Typeset for Universities. Manage research output of your university. Typeset for Publishers. Institutional Repository. Best in-class solution to host and manage your research.

Write new papers. Draft and submit to reputed journals with accuracy. XML Generation. OJS Hosting. Host via OJS. Immediate IT assistance. Individual Services. Plagiarism Check. Journal Submission. Subscription Offers. Lifetime Plan. Buy once, use forever. Get all new features for free. Student Monthly Plan. Student Yearly Plan. Best for postgraduates and research scholars.

Free Upgrades. Refer your University. Refer your university and get a free Typeset Researcher plan. End user license agreement. Help Center.

Tutorials and Videos. Join our team. Building products that have a global impact. Sample paper formatted on Typeset - typeset.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000